Diagnostic Analysis of Family Understanding of School Curriculum Goals and Structure

Authors

  • Naylur Rosyid STKIP Babunnajah Pandeglang
  • Eha Suhayari Universitas Mathla'ul Anwar Banten

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61166/elm.v3i2.102

Keywords:

Diagnostic Analysis, Family Understanding, Curriculum Objectives, Curriculum Structure, Independent Curriculum.

Abstract

The role of families in education is increasingly strengthened with the implementation of the Independent Curriculum, which positions students as the subjects of learning and emphasizes competency and character development. However, the success of curriculum implementation is determined not only by the readiness of schools and teachers, but also by families' understanding of the objectives and structure of the school curriculum. This study aims to diagnostically analyze the level of family understanding of the objectives and structure of the elementary school curriculum. The study used a descriptive approach with a diagnostic study design. The subjects were families of elementary school students at SDN Sukasari 1, Sukasari Village, Pulosari District, Pandeglang Regency. Data were collected through diagnostic questionnaires and structured interviews, then analyzed descriptively quantitatively and qualitatively. The results showed that families' understanding of the curriculum objectives was in the moderate category, while their understanding of the curriculum structure was in the low category. These findings indicate a gap in curriculum literacy among families that has the potential to impact the effectiveness of student learning support at home. This study contributes by providing an initial mapping of family curriculum literacy that can serve as a basis for formulating school-family communication and partnership programs to support the implementation of the Independent Curriculum.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kementerian Pendidikan Riset, dan Teknologi K. Kurikulum Merdeka: Kerangka Dasar dan Struktur Kurikulum 2022.

Maylawati DS, Mulyana R, Rizqullah N, Nurjaman I, Ramdhani MA. Assessing Indonesian Islamic schools’ readiness for the independent curriculum using text analytics. Multidiscip Rev 2025;8. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025336.

Purwandari S, Wangid MN, Izzaty RE, Maulyda MA. National Curriculum and Parental Involvement: Bridging Home and School Education. Hum Res Rehabil 2025;15:195–207. https://doi.org/10.21554/hrr.042516.

Rozzaqyah F. Exploring elementary teacher education students’ perception on parental involvement. Int J Eval Res Educ 2024;13:230–9. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i1.25441.

Smith TE, Reinke WM, Herman KC, Huang F. Understanding Family-School Engagement Across and Within Elementaryand Middle-School Contexts. Sch Psychol 2019;34:363–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000290.

Kemendikbudristek. Kajian Akademik Kurikulum Merdeka. Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi; 2024.

Rodríguez-Rubio P, Martín-Ávila J, Rodríguez-Jiménez E, Valero-Moreno S, Montoya-Castilla I, Pérez-Marín M. The Impact of the 10VIDA Program on Socioemotional Adjustment and Psychological Well-Being in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Preliminary Study. Children 2025;12. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12101291.

Willemse TM, Nelen MJM, Blonk A. Including families in the implementation of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and support: Dutch administrators and SWPBIS-leadership team experiences. Psychol Sch 2024;61:3942–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23266.

Creswell J. Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Approches. SAGE; 2014.

Fraenkel JR, Wallen NE, Hyun HH. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2012.

Reinke WM, Smith TE, Herman KC. Family-School Engagement Across Child and Adolescent Development. Sch Psychol 2019;34:346–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000322.

Memon MA, Thurasamy R, Ting H, Cheah J-H. PURPOSIVE SAMPLING: A REVIEW AND GUIDELINES FOR QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH. J Appl Struct Equ Model 2025;9:1–23. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.9(1)01.

Wu Suen L-J, Huang H-M, Lee H-H. A comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. J Nurs 2014;61:105–11. https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.61.3.105.

Lam JLM, Chan ZCY. Revisiting of questionnaires and structured interviews. Clin. Res. Issues Nurs., 2010, hal. 91–104.

Wilder S. Effects of Parental Involvement on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Synthesis. Educ Rev 2014;66:377–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.780009.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-03

How to Cite

Naylur Rosyid, & Eha Suhayari. (2026). Diagnostic Analysis of Family Understanding of School Curriculum Goals and Structure. Elementaria: Journal of Educational Research, 3(2), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.61166/elm.v3i2.102

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.